Comments 83
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
es.scribd.com/document/4459448…
So, I asked not to upload to other websites, and you removed the credit and keep the notice
for you.
So, I asked not to upload to other websites, and you removed the credit and keep the notice
for you.
I'm going to assume this group is now dead; the majority of the Admins have been away for over 200 weeks and my attempt to join the group has expired today.
This group is dead?
Not dead, I and a few other of the admins were just away for a while.
Is there a threshold as to where you consider something not biologically possible or not unique enough to submit? I have one breed that appears mostly mundane, their conformation being that of a sighthound breed (unique when you consider the sighthound breeds), but their concept is unique. But they're also magical; does that affect the "biologically possible" label? I have another breed that is more original in theme--Teapups.
And how's about single unique species/breeds concepts, like fav.me/d6gbhro ? Also, would you consider that kind of sketch quality sub-quality?
I do have more separate sorts of concepts, but I was wondering if my breeds and breed-things (species that closely resemble something already) would be welcome.
It's mostly based upon looks. If a breed, say, looks nearly identical to a cat species, horse, dog breed or some other species, we generally decline it.
Hard to tell when a horse doesn't look like a horse >>; I used to think Arabians basically looked like anything, then people start pointing out breed differences and everything suddenly looks very different XD;
I'll figure it out. Most of mine are dogs, anyways.